June 13th: Personhood

    

June 13th: ANIMALhood and PERSONhood

June 13, 2024

Today, personhood for animals was debated through the extension of yesterday's discussion on scientific objectivity in the interpretation of animals. Genetically, animals are not the same as humans, but the line and extent to which they can be distinguished is still an ongoing moral debate. There are profound philosophical questions touching on the nature of personhood, moral consideration, and ethical treatment of beings.




The concept of personhood is often debated in philosophy, law, and ethics. Typically, criteria for personhood include various aspects like consciousness, reasoning, self-motivated activity, and communication capacity. If an entity does not meet all these criteria, whether it is considered a person can vary. For example, infants, people with severe cognitive disabilities, and comatose individuals might not meet all criteria but are still considered persons due to potential, societal, or relational factors.


The rights of persons typically outweigh those of non-persons in many legal and moral frameworks. However, this is not absolute. Consider these scenarios:

Environmental ethics: Protecting ecosystems might involve prioritizing non-persons (like species or habitats) over individual human desires, and recognizing the intrinsic value of nature.

Animal rights: Situations where animal welfare might take precedence over human convenience, such as banning cruel farming practices.


Determining the line between morally considerable and non-considerable beings is complex. Generally, entities capable of suffering, having preferences, or contributing to the well-being of a system are morally considerable. Reflecting on whether animals are treated as they should be involves considering their welfare, autonomy, and the ethical implications of our actions. Many argue for improved conditions, more humane treatment, and respecting animal rights, but the discussion continues. For more information, click these links:

https://www.humanesociety.org/resources/animal-cruelty-facts-and-stats

https://www.britannica.com/topic/animal-rights

https://www.peta.org/about-peta/why-peta/why-animal-rights/


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

About me and my blog

Image
 Welcome To My World All about Daniel Zhang Hello, my name is Daniel Zhang and I'm from Knoxville, Tennessee. Tennessee is on the east side of the United States and Knoxville is on the east side of Tennesee. I am very excited to introduce my blog, Daniel's Approach to STEM. In this blog, I will discuss my approach and opinions on upcoming novel technology that shapes the world around us. I am interested in many things that bridge the gap between academia and real-world applications especially in the context of STEM and technology. STEM and Technology           I also have a YouTube channel and Instagram. If you would like to access them, here they are.  Instagram  and  YouTube
Read more

Op-Ed: Digital Divide

Op-Ed: Digital Divide In a world where information and opportunities are increasingly digital, millions of people in developing third-world countries need more access to the internet and modern technology. This digital divide hampers educational and economic opportunities, continuing inequality, and creating a barrier to progress that is becoming ever harder to overcome. According to the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) , over 2.6 billion people still lack internet access, with the majority residing in developing nations ( https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/stat/default.aspx ). As the COVID-19 pandemic has largely shifted services and jobs to an online system, the urgency to bridge this digital divide has never been more critical. Furthermore, the divide is exemplified by the urgent need for targeted efforts to expand internet access in underserved regions. For example, in the African subcontinent, only 25% of the population uses the internet, compared to 80% in E...
Read more

The Self Driving Trolley Problem

Image
  June 3rd: The Self-Driving Trolley Problem June 3, 2024 Amidst the rise of newer developmental technology in STEM and other related fields, major ethical problems take an interesting turn. Most notably in today's society, the rise of artificial intelligence and robotics makes the famous Trolley Problem turn into the self-driving car problem.  For the problem today, the current moral dilemma is regarding the ethical questions surrounding self-driving cars. The self-driving car has three choices for lanes that all result in some sort of damage a) left into the SUV, b) straight into the obstacles, c) right into the motorcycle If I were the programmer, I would have the car choose “left” in the SUV Putting everything in a ranking of most priority to least priority for the self-driving car, I would program the car to first prioritize the safety of the driver and passengers inside. Then, I would program the car to prioritize minimizing damage to other drivers and the environme...
Read more